Sedna
Sedna information Average distance from Sun: 78629540000 km (525.5985 AU) Perihelion (closest): 11392832000 km Perihelion (farthest): 145866248000 km Equatorial radius: 590 - 900 km (Diameter: 1180 km) Mass: 200 - 600000000 kg Density: 2 g/cm³ Equatorial surface gravity: 0.33 - 0.50 m/s² Escape velocity: 620 - 950 m/s Siderial rotation period (length of day): 10 earth hours Siderial orbit period (length of year): 4401380 earth days Mean orbit velocity: 1040 m/s Orbital eccentricity: 0.855 Orbital inclination to ecliptic: 11.934 degrees Equatorial inclination to orbit: 357.455 degrees Surface temperature (min/max): 12 K		Sedna, Sun
Sedna Sedna is a trans-Neptunian object, discovered by Michael Brown (Caltech), Chad Trujillo (Gemini Observatory) and David Rabinowitz (Yale University) on November 14, 2003. At the time of its discovery it was the most distant observed natural solar system body, though this has now been exceeded by 2003 UB313. Sedna is described as a cold planetoid, perhaps two-thirds the size of Pluto. Sedna was discovered during a survey conducted with the Samuel Oschin telescope at Palomar Observatory near San Diego, California (USA) using Yale's 160 Megapixel Palomar Quest camera and was observed within days on telescopes from Chile, Spain, and the USA (Arizona, and Hawaii). NASA's orbiting Spitzer Space Telescope was also pointed toward the object, but could not detect it — putting an upper-bound on its diameter at roughly three-quarters that of Pluto. Because of its cold, distant nature, and because all other planets and an extensive number of other objects within the Solar system are named after (Roman and Greek) gods, the scientists who discovered it unofficially named it after Sedna, the Inuit goddess of the sea, who was believed to live in the cold depths of the Arctic Ocean. Before Sedna was officially named it had provisional designation 2003 VB12. As of September 28, 2004, the International Astronomical Union has officially accepted the name 'Sedna'. Sedna has a highly elliptical orbit, with its aphelion estimated at 975 AU and its perihelion at about 76.16 AU. At its discovery it was approaching perihelion at about 90 AU from the Sun. It was the farthest from the Sun that any solar system object had up to then been observed, although some objects like long-period comets originally observed at closer distances were most likely further from the Sun than Sedna but too dim to be observed. 2003 UB313 was later detected at 97 AU. Sedna's orbit takes about 12050 years. It will reach perihelion in 2075 or 2076. When first discovered, Sedna was believed to have an unusually long rotational period (20 to 50 days). A search was thus made for a natural satellite, the most likely cause for such a long rotation, but investigation by the Hubble Space Telescope in March 2004 observed no such object orbiting the planetoid. New measurements from the MMT telescope suggest a much shorter rotation period, only about 10 hours, rather typical for bodies of its size. A study done by Hal Levison and Alessandro Morbidelli of the Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur (OCA) in Nice, France, suggested that the most likely explanation for Sedna's orbit was that it had been perturbed by a close (~800AU) pass by another star in the first 100 million years or so of the solar system's existence, possibly one of the other stars that formed out of the same collapsing nebula as the Sun.[2] They proposed another, less probable scenario that managed to explain Sedna's orbit very well —Sedna could have formed around a brown dwarf about 20 times less massive than the Sun and have been captured by the solar system when the brown dwarf passed through it. Another possible explanation, advanced by Gomez, involves a hypothetical distant ‘planet’ (a planetary-sized companion in the inner Oort cloud). Recent simulation show that Sedna's orbit characteristics could be explained by perturbations by a Neptune-mass object at 2000AU (or less), a Jupiter-mass at 5000AU or even an Earth-mass object at 1000AU. Another object, 2000 CR105, has an orbit similar to Sedna's but a bit less extreme: perihelion is 45 AU, aphelion is 415 AU, and the orbital period is 3420 years. Its orbit may have resulted from the same processes that produced Sedna's orbit. Sedna has an estimated diameter of between 1180 and 1800 kilometres (730 to 1120 miles). At the time of its discovery it was the largest object found in the solar system since Pluto was discovered in 1930. It is now generally believed to be the 4th largest known trans-Neptunian object after 2003 UB313, Pluto, and 2005 FY9. The planetoid is so far from the Sun that the temperature never rises above 23 kelvins (-240 °C; -400 °F). Observations from Chile show that Sedna is one of the reddest objects in the solar system, nearly as red as Mars. Unlike Pluto and Charon, Sedna appears to have very little methane ice or water ice on its surface; Chad Trujillo and his colleagues at the Gemini Observatory in Hawaii suggest that Sedna's dark red color is caused by a hydrocarbon sludge, or tholin, like that found on 5145 Pholus.[4] Its surface is homogenous in colour and spectrum; this is probably because Sedna, unlike objects nearer the sun, is rarely impacted by other bodies, which would expose bright patches like that on 8405 Asbolus. Sedna's and Triton's spectra have been recently compared suggesting the following common model of the surface: 24% Triton tholin, 7% amorphous carbon, 26% methanol ice with 33% methane. The discoverers have argued that Sedna is actually the first observed body belonging to the Oort cloud, saying that it is too far out to be considered a Kuiper belt object. Because it is a great deal closer to the Sun than was expected for an Oort cloud object, and has an inclination roughly in line with the planets and the Kuiper belt, they describe the planetoid as being an inner Oort cloud object, situated in the disc reaching from the Kuiper belt to the spherical part of the cloud. However, others believe that its inclination and size qualify it as a Kuiper Belt object. These astronomers suggest that previous assumptions about the outer edge of the Kuiper Belt should be revised outward. Writing in Nature, astronomers Scott J. Kenyon and Benjamin C. Bromley consider Sedna's origin and argue that a passing star probably scattered Sedna from the Sun's Kuiper belt into its observed orbit. They estimate the probability that Sedna was captured from the outer disk of the passing star at about 10%. The discovery of Sedna has also resurrected the question of which astronomical objects should be considered planets and which should not. On March 15, 2004, articles in the popular press reported that 'the tenth planet has been discovered', and some believe its claim to planethood is comparable to that of Pluto. Sedna's discoverers (like others) call it a planetoid, but because the two objects are similar in size and composition, a permanent decision to classify Sedna as a planetoid could re-open questions about whether Pluto should also bear that classification. Isaac Asimov suggested the term mesoplanet be used for planetary objects intermediate in size between Mercury and 1 Ceres, which would include both Pluto and Sedna. With the draft proposal for the definition of a planet, whose adoption will be considered in a vote on August 24, 2006, by the International Astronomical Union[8], Sedna may be made a candidate for consideration as a 'pluton', a proposed classification for a planet that takes more than 200 years to orbit the Sun. It is not, however, among the three objects (Ceres, Charon and 2003 UB313) that would immediately be considered a planet if the definition is adopted by the IAU.
More Discovered by M. Brown, C. Trujillo, D. Rabinowitz in November 14, 2003
Find more information on Sedna